Our response to the DfE notes that geography is not mentioned in the consultation document, despite at the time being the only subject with statutory reference to the provision of fieldwork in school. It also advocates for substantive commitments to fieldwork.
Response submitted 2006
Yes. We support the vision statement.
There is no mention at all of geography in the consultation document. While we commend the commitment to ‘learning in all subjects’ set out in Aim One, the reality is that a subject such as geography has education outside the classroom at its core. Geography is the only subject that has statutory reference to the provision of fieldwork in school, and indeed the importance of fieldwork is also fully recognised in the benchmarking of geography in Higher Education (Quality Assurance Agency, 2000). Fieldwork has been fully recognised in the programmes of study for the National Curriculum, Key Stages 1, 2 and 3. For example, at Key Stage 3, students must ‘carry out fieldwork investigations outside the classroom’ (DfEE and QCA, 1999). Education outside the classroom can benefit all subjects within the curriculum but for geography it is one of the ‘subject-specific essentials’ (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 2003).
Comments on the list of aims:
AIM 1 – revise to include one residential at primary, and one at secondary level, stressing need for these to be a part of a coherent and progressive programme.
AIM 2 – revise to ‘support and encourage’; include specific reference to ‘training’ with respect to Initial Teacher Training (ITT) and the Training and Development Agency for Schools (TDA).
AIM 3 – also engage with teaching unions to allay fears of litigation, and ensure revision of union guidance to teachers.
AIM 4 – this would seem to make more sense as being the first in the list of aims/top priority as it encapsulates what the Manifesto is trying to achieve. The role of Government is critical, and needs to be drawn from the subtext to the headline. Include also the role ITT and Continuing Professional Development (CPD) need to play, plus inclusion in Ofsted self-evaluation forms (SEF) or Spotlight Inspections. Particular emphasis also on influencing head teachers and governors.
AIM 5 – it is important that education outside the classroom becomes an integral part of a child’s education. Whilst parents and carers will play a role in this, it is important that teachers are formally enabled and helped to take up education opportunities outside the classrooom.
AIM 6 – rather than just ‘encouraging’ partnerships, there needs to be action to facilitate and enable schools to work efficiently and effectively with all providers, including funding opportunities.
AIM 7 – this would definitely help to enable partnership working, but standards need to be clearly defined and easy for all (providers and teachers) to interpret. There is a risk of trying to provide too much information through the standard (over and above meeting minimum requirements) which may serve to confuse and reduce participation.
AIM 8 – this is likely to represent one of the biggest challenges to the providers, so (financial) commitment of support and facilitation from Government is critical here. Further guidance is also required on how inclusion within extended schools would actually be expected to work. Current phrasing of this aim could also be improved.
Education outside the classroom makes a unique contribution to a geographical education. It helps bring the geography curriculum alive in the real world – and allows the real work to stimulate pupils’ curiosity and learning back in the classroom. Indeed it is possible to argue that if pupils do not take part in geographically based fieldwork they are not undertaking the full statutory range of their geographical education. As the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) puts it, fieldwork is one of the ‘subject specific essentials’ (QCA, 2003).
Learning outside the classroom also provides a unique and important contribution to a young person’s development in that it builds upon and engages young peoples’ experiences, it challenges them in settings they are not accustomed to, and encourages team building skills and confidence building.
Another important benefit of outdoor education is that it offers a positive opportunity for students to examine and evaluate risk and thus to learn about risk management as a life skill. Schools already directly address issues of risk, choice and the implications of behaviour within established areas of the curriculum e.g. sex education/relationships and also drugs education. Why not therefore address risk positively in the case of outdoor education?
Education outside the classroom can also have a unique benefit to teachers themselves – encouraging leadership, building positive relationships between pupils and teachers and reinforcing their subject interest and expertise. According to a fieldwork and outdoor education working group that was part of the Action Plan for Geography to be launched in Spring 2006 (a collaboration between the DfES, Geographical Association and RGS-IBG), many geography teachers value their involvement in fieldwork and list it as an important reason for taking up geography teaching in the first place. Teacher-led fieldwork and outdoor education should remain an important part of provision.
Strongly agree. Education outside the classroom should not be an integral part of every young person’s education just for the sake of it. It must be high quality learning experience – not just a leisure ‘trip’ – and involve progression and meet students personalised learning needs. It is essential that fieldwork retains its status throughout the teaching of geography.
Not sure. We strongly support the vision of the Manifesto, and belief in the essential role it should play in every child’s education. The current draft Manifesto set out in this consultation is, however, dominated by ‘warm words’, as the Education and Skills Select Committee warned in its inquiry into education outside the classroom (the Education and Skills Select Committee, September 2004).
We are willing to be a signatory to the Manifesto, but only if there are more substantive commitments that will boost fieldwork and learning beyond the classroom. The aims are commendable but there are no tangible goals, actions or even a timetable by which to measure success. The only concrete commitment is to ‘at least one residential experience’ for all children. There needs to be specific, measurable, achievable and realistic targets. For example, the nine sector working groups have recommended some practical proposals for the Manifesto and, at the very least, it is hoped that these should be included in the Manifesto document.
We recommend the following additions to the Manifesto:
ensure an Educational Visits Coordinator in every school.
increase the demand and supply of training, advice and resources through subject-specific Continued Professional Development and Initial Teacher Training. This should be specifically targeted at fieldwork and outdoor education rather than generic training. The aim is to encourage primary and secondary teachers to have the confidence and knowledge to provide highquality outdoor geographical learning, including especially fieldwork in and about the local area.
create a ‘family of quality marks’ for fieldwork, outdoor education, expeditions.
ensure that out of classroom learning becomes part of the school’s Ofsted self-evaluation forms (SEF) subject to ‘spotlight’ inspections, and always included in Quality & Curriculum Authority annual subject reports.
establishing partnerships with the three main teaching unions to overcome the fear of litigation.
Without making such commitments now, the Manifesto will lack any substance and potentially present nothing more than statements of ambition.
We are willing to make a pledge but hope that they are matched by commitments in the Manifesto by the Government and other key stakeholders. Potential pledges from the RGS-IBG are as follows:
Develop a British Standard Institution (BSI) ‘kitemark’ for ‘outdoor adventurous activities, expeditions and fieldwork – guidelines on safety management for outdoor activities overseas’. It is intended to build on existing UK guidance and will involve wide consultation to benchmark current good practice that could then be used as a voluntary standard by anyone organising such activities overseas.
Pilot a project to promote the use of ICT and new technologies such as Geographical Information Sciences – digital mapping and spatial analysis of data and information that has revolutionised geography in academia, business, government and beyond – to enhance the fieldwork experience.
Secure the continuing inclusion of fieldwork within the Quality Assurance Agency geography benchmark statement in the forthcoming review of the benchmark. Ensure the importance of vibrant fieldwork in HE sector is fully recognised so that geography graduates that become teachers have experienced high-quality fieldwork themselves.
We highlight how geography and GI can enable more efficient transport networks
We recommend the inclusion of subject bodies as key information providers and highlight the Society's provision of subject choice advice.
In our response to the QAA consultation, we do not support the idea of an external advisor on academic standards, and note that proposed classification descriptors should be related to Subject Benchmark Statements.
Our response welcomes the proposed release of certain OS datasets, and argues for sustained long-term funding for OS and MasterMap.
By placing a booking, you are permitting us to store and use your (and any other attendees) details in order to fulfil the booking.
We will not use your details for marketing purposes without your explicit consent.
You must be a member holding a valid Society membership to view the content you are trying to access. Please login to continue.
Join us today, Society membership is open to anyone with a passion for geography
Cookies on the RGS website