Our response to the Ofqual consultation on controlled assessment conveys feedback from teachers, including that controlled assessment has reduced teaching time, and expressing 'unanimous support' for fieldwork.
Response submitted in 2012
The Society works on a face-to-face basis with teachers and pupils from more than 50% of English secondary schools and our online educational resources receive 400,000+ ‘user sessions’ annually. For schools we provide online support and resources, CPD and the professional accreditation (C.Geog. teacher), support for fieldwork, and the Geography Ambassador programme which promotes the relevance of geography to further study and careers.
This response draws on the Society’s ongoing work with schools, discussion held with our Education Committee (which includes representatives from the independent and maintained sectors, and ITE) and a focus group held with 20 expert geography teachers from across the independent and maintained sectors1 who teach across six GCSE and three IGCSE specifications. We also note information relevant to geography within the following Ofqual research:
Evaluation of the Introduction of Controlled Assessment: report on qualitative and quantitative research (2011)
Review of Standards in GCE A Level Geography 2001-2010 (2012)
The New GCSE Examinations: Findings from the Monitoring of New Qualifications in French, Business and Geography 2010-11 (2012)
Teachers have indicated that controlled assessment (CA) has reduced the opportunities for plagiarism that were inherent in the previous approach to coursework.
However, there are mixed, and polarised, views among specialist geography teachers about the pros and cons of controlled assessment (CA) on their pupils’ achievement.
A number of teachers from across maintained and independent schools are strongly opposed to controlled assessment. Many of these teachers, particularly those from independent schools, have voted with their feet and moved from GCSE to IGCSEs . A number have specifically cited the lack of CA with IGCSEs as the reason for this move, “it [CA] was the key factor”. In addition, such teachers have indicated that the introduction of CA within GCSE had a negative impact on the achievement of their high performing (A and A*) pupils. One teacher commented, “controlled assessment failed to allow for more able students to really display their ability”. A number of teachers in the maintained sector hold similar views and have expressed interest in moving from GCSE to IGCSE or the new Certificates.
Some maintained teachers identified that CA has improved the achievement of their students, particularly their weaker students. The latter was often expressed in comparison to the achievement of comparable students under the previous coursework regime. One teacher commented, “weaker ones, who would miss deadlines and produce very little or lose work, have benefited.”
We note that Ofqual has also commented on the variable impact of CA (for OCR geography B) on students’ achievement. The level of demand was not always comparable across the geographical investigation tasks and the marking criteria for the fieldwork task did not encourage outcomes that were accurate and fair to the full range of candidates2 .
Controlled assessment has definitely impacted negatively on teaching time within geography lessons. Many teachers have complained that the introduction of CA has significantly cut into their teaching time. Estimates range from a loss of 10 hours to up to half a term's worth of lesson time. One teacher noted, “I have less lesson time to teach the syllabus and do revision, due to having to complete CA in lesson time”. These comments chime with Ofqual’s research which identified that 24% of geography teachers identified the loss of teaching time as the biggest problem with CA3.
Across all geography teachers there is unanimous support for geographical fieldwork being a compulsory element of geography study at GCSE (and indeed at all phases of geographical education.) The Society strongly supports the need for fieldwork to be an essential and required element of geographical learning at all stages. Teachers are concerned that unless geography GCSEs include the assessment of fieldwork there will be pressure from school leaders to reduce the range and extent of fieldwork and that this would negatively impact student achievement, engagement with, and understanding of, the subject. The Society would not wish to see any reduction of geographical fieldwork within GCSE.
The introduction of CA in some schools has limited the range and style of fieldwork that is now undertaken. Teachers noted that the flexibility that was provided through coursework has been removed. One teacher commented, “we used to offer a wide choice of fieldwork and conduct an enormous range of primary and secondary research techniques. Under CA that all became a distraction and now exam success seems to be guaranteed with such a limited range of skills and choices.”
Teachers also argue that fieldwork is necessary to enable pupils to undertake specific geographical tasks which cannot be fully assessed through external assessment. These tasks include:
Geographical fieldwork observation, measurement techniques, investigation approaches and analytical skills i.e. “getting your hands dirty with real geography”.
Undertaking independent work through all the stages of a project in a real setting: from hypothesis/question setting, data collection, handling, processing and analysis and reviewing the original question.
Using Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in a real context, alongside the practical handling of equipment in the field (e.g. GPS and sampling equipment) and application of statistical techniques.
Teachers have little enthusiasm for a paper based externally assessed ‘fieldwork exam’ at either GCSE or A Level. A number of teachers argued that pupils might be taught how to pass this exam without setting foot outside the classroom
The Society also notes that the previous removal of coursework from A Level geography has had a detrimental impact on the assessment of geographical skills, particularly in relation to fieldwork. As Ofqual has identified, “Coursework - typically a 4,000-word investigation - was an effective way to assess skills by, for example, undertaking and reporting on investigative fieldwork. Reviewers found that (the current A Level examinations) were not as effective at assessing skills as coursework”4. The Society strongly recommends that coursework is reintroduced into A Level geography.
Specific practical aspects of CA have been difficult for geography teachers to implement. These include access to ICT, managing the number of pupils undertaking CA and the timetabling of fieldwork alongside CA lessons. These comments concur with Ofqual’s research which identified that geography teachers were more likely than average across all teachers to highlight problems with timetabling, managing student numbers and limited ICT resources5. The impact of this, alongside the other work necessary to implement CA, has increased geography teachers’ workload (although teachers note CA has reduced their pupils’ workload).
Teachers have also called for better support to be provided by the awarding bodies.
Many teachers expressed support for the important and continuing role of teacher assessment and wished to see this as part of GCSE and A Level geography.
At GCSE there is not an agreed view among the teachers consulted as to whether this should be through coursework, current controlled assessment or a revision of the latter.
At A Level both the Society and the teachers consulted argue strongly for reintroduction of a requirement for coursework linked to fieldwork.
Can the practical operation of controlled assessment be improved? Some teachers indicated that over time CA was becoming less problematic as teachers (and their schools) became more familiar with its implementation. Suggestions for improving the current CA arrangements included lower levels of control; reducing the time requirement; shorter reports; and improving the quality of external moderation. However, many geography teachers would still recommend that CA is removed from geography GCSE.
Meaningful fieldwork is an essential part of the geographical learning experience and must be retained at GCSE and A Level.
At A Level, fieldwork should be part of an individual, independent study that is assessed through traditional coursework.
At GCSE there remains a need to undertake and assess fieldwork and to do this in a manner that (a) helps safeguard against plagiarism and undue external support, (b) has the capacity to engage and stretch the full range of learners across the ability range, (c) is realistic in terms of both teachers and pupils time and (d) does not eat heavily into lesson time. We are not convinced that either traditional coursework or CA does this well, for different reasons. We suggest Ofqual set up a short term working party to consider alternatives that meet these needs, and to consider whether the current allocation of 25% the marks to CA is appropriate.
1 Schools involved in this focus group include representatives from: Altrincham Grammar School, Camden School for Girls, Charterhouse, Eton, Harrow, James Allen’s Girls School, King Edward VI Five Ways, King Edward VI Grammar School, Latymer Upper School, New Charter Academy, New Hall School, Shrewsbury, Sir Joseph Williamson School, St Helena School and Swanwick Hall School
2 The New GCSE Examinations: Findings from the Monitoring of New Qualifications in French, Business and Geography 2010-11 Ofqual, pp. 14-15
3 Evaluation of the Introduction of Controlled Assessment Ofqual 2011, p. 37
4 Review of Standards in GCE A level Geography 2001 and 2010
5 Evaluation of the Introduction of Controlled Assessment Ofqual 2011, p. 72
This year marks the 20th anniversary of the Neville Shulman Challenge Award, established for the Society by Neville Shulman CBE FRGS.
3 November 2021
Richard Phillips leads a month-long traverse across tough ground, a journey of exploration and science that leads his students to reinterpret their sense of place.
11 March 2021
This month’s issue of Sidetracked magazine features a foreword from Society Director Professor Joe Smith.
14 February 2019
Ian Coady is a Geospatial Advisor for the Department for International Development.
To mark the centenary of the first European expeditions to Mount Everest in the early 1920s, the Society is exploring and reflecting on the context, depiction, and legacy of these early expeditions.
11 November 2022
Sheffield City Council has declared a climate emergency and has established a plan to become zero carbon by 2030. What are the challenges it faces in achieving this ambitious target?
26 May 2021
Shepherd and bestselling author James speaks about farming life in the Lake District fells, why historic farmed landscapes matter and are loved by people, and how they might survive in the future.
14 December 2015
Our response evaluates the 1+3 model in general, and highlights inflexible quota allocations and limited options for quantitative training as discipline-specific issues.
By placing a booking, you are permitting us to store and use your (and any other attendees) details in order to fulfil the booking.
We will not use your details for marketing purposes without your explicit consent.
You must be a member holding a valid Society membership to view the content you are trying to access. Please login to continue.
Join us today, Society membership is open to anyone with a passion for geography
Cookies on the RGS website