The Co$ting Nature policy support tool helps to map the relative value provided to humanity by protected areas and other ecosystems.
The world’s protected ecosystems have obvious intrinsic value to the people living near them and for the landscapes and species they preserve, but they also provide quantifiable economic benefits to humanity. These are known as ‘ecosystem services’ and include the provision of reliable clean water, and crop production, the regulation of the global climate and include the role of supporting services such as soil formation. These are all critical to the delivery of food, water and energy but which are often go unrecognised and unquantified in economic decision-making.
Co$ting Nature, a web-based geographical information system that combines satellite-derived datasets was developed by Professor Mark Mulligan and a team of researchers at King’s College London, working with Community Interest Company AmbioTEK, in partnership with the UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
A screenshot of the Co$ting Nature tool
It combines datasets on carbon uptake, rainfall, terrain and urban extents with data on human populations, protected areas and carbon stocks. Policy insight and support for decision-making is provided by ‘neo-geo’ interactive maps, which are based on relative valuations of ecosystem services. These allow conservation and development organisations to understand the values of existing and proposed protected areas and the implications of their conservation or loss.
The tool’s interactive maps and data allows the testing of conservation strategies prior to implementation, and enables more strategic planning of agriculture and nature around cities, such as in support of population stresses on landscapes, habitat biodiversity, and clean water supplies.
Co$tingNature was used in the COMPANDES project led by Professor Mulligan, which aimed to identify effective drainage basin management mechanisms in the Andes. Co$tingNature was used to place a high-ecosystem services case study site in the national context and identify areas of particular importance, which contributed to the project’s aims of developing Benefit Sharing Mechanisms for drainage basins.
This case study was originally published by the Society in 2011 and updated in 2019.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is cited.
How to cite
Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) (2019) Mapping the value of nature. Case study. [online] Available at: http://www.rgs.org/geography/advocacy-and-impact/impact/mapping-value-nature/. Last accessed on: <date>
By placing a booking, you are permitting us to store and use your (and any other attendees) details in order to fulfil the booking.
We will not use your details for marketing purposes without your explicit consent.
You must be a member holding a valid Society membership to view the content you are trying to access. Please login to continue.
Join us today, Society membership is open to anyone with a passion for geography
Cookies on the RGS website